:: Welcome to INQ Online ::

Advertise your company here


Tilda basmati rice

Abstract Lifestyle
Welcome to Features.
Below we have provided our users with some articles that have been published by INQ... Look out for our Exclusive Web Articles on-line!
Features
FeaturesBNP - Are We to Blame?
FeaturesHuman Rights or Human     Wrongs?


Words by Nish Choudhury Artwork by Pasha BNP - Are we to blame?

“So how come you lot do everything you can for the Kosovans and the Africans, but you don’t do anything for people born and bred in this country?”

This was something said to me when I was campaigning against the BNP in Barking last year. It wasn’t a white, working class male. Far from it. It was a middle-class Asian man who was trying to get me to help get his wife over from Pakistan.

I came up against this quite a bit. Africans who hated Muslims. Pakistanis complaining about Kosovans. People with Irish names talking about the ‘boat people’. It was no surprise when the BNP won 12 of the 13 Council seats it went for in Barking and Dagenham’s Council elections.

We now see the BNP standing in 827 seats across Britain, including full slates in places like Birmingham and Leeds. There is a real chance that they could win in many of these areas. And it’s not just skinheaded, DM wearing Nazis neither. They’re long gone. It’s average people. Maybe even your neighbour. The BNP have cleaned up their act. They even have an ‘Ethnic Liaison Officer’ for crying out loud. Asians have appeared in their party-political broadcasts. Many of their policies have been watered down to appeal to the average voter. And people are flocking to them in their droves. These people are not necessarily racist. They just feel let down by the mainstream parties and feel that ‘their England’ is no longer here. Don’t be fooled though. The BNP are still a racist party. They do not allow non-whites to join. They believe in repatriation. They are still racists, but won’t say so.

How did we end up here? Growing up in the 1980’s, we were ‘politically black’. ‘Black’ groups often included many Asians. Now? We have black and Pakistani kids trying to kill each other in Birmingham. Indians saying that they should not be called Asian as it means they get lumped with Bangladeshis and Pakistanis. Bengali gangs battling it out with Somali and white gangs in Tower Hamlets. This is not what multi-culturalism was about.

And by doing this, we don’t help matters. Why is it that Muslim men are less likely to vote than non-Muslims? A recent Joseph Rowntree Foundation report suggested that South Asians are less likely to be registered than other communities and that Muslim South Asians are even less likely to vote. After taking registration and everything into account, only 48% of Muslim men vote. That’s truly shocking. Especially considering that people have died to get the vote in Pakistan and Bangladesh, both countries under military rule as I write. We can complain about the war and prejudice, but if we don’t vote, who’ll listen?

There is, however, alienation from the major political parties. This is something I understand very well, having been involved in the Bethnal Green and Bow Campaign of 2005. Bengalis used their vote to oust Oona King because she voted for the War. At the time I thought that this showed great political maturity amongst Muslims. Then 7/7 happened. And it seemed that not all Muslims wanted to go down the political route. There were some idiots who wanted to blow up innocent people to get their message across instead.  

If we really want the BNP to get into the corridors of power, we should carry on as we are. We don’t register. We don’t vote. We sometimes think religious extremism is justified. We do not unite with other people who have exactly the same experience of Britain as us. If we allow these racists to win seats in Asian areas, we are to blame. We are not getting politically active. We are listening to fools offering paradise on a plate instead. We need to be registering our vote, unifying with other minorities and ethnic groups and abandoning the extremists.  

I know Labour have let us down. I know the Tories are masquerading at being nice. I know the Lib Dems are wishy-washy. But, you need to hold your nose and make your voice heard. Go. Vote. Be active. Don’t let these racists with smiling faces get into Councils where they might have the say-so in how Council services are run. Once they get into Councils, they’ll get a parliamentary seat. Once they get one, they’ll get more. If we let that happen, then, quite simply, it’s our fault. We can’t go and blame the media. We can’t go and talk about racism. It’s up to us to make things happen for ourselves.

Get Full Article - Issue IGet the Full Article | Return to top

 

Words by Salma Hossain, Artwork by PashaHuman rights or human wrongs

Cuba is a long way from the UK, so perhaps you can be forgiven for not realising what has been going on around the other side of the world for the past 5 years.  However you don’t have to go to Cuba to find terror suspects controversially imprisoned.  A little closer to home, both foreign nationals and British Citizens are being held at HMP Belmarsh, Long Lartin and Woodhill for years without charge or trial.  Welcome to Britain’s Guantanamo Bay.  What is more worrying is that despite there being intense public pressure regarding Guantanamo, there has largely been indifference to prisoners held in the UK.  “There aren’t pictures of the detainees at Belmarsh in fluorescent orange jump suits being led around in shackles… They are anonymous, faceless people,” says Liberty. 

Most of us I assume have faith in our legal system.  Surely the government would protect any one of us if we were imprisoned under false pretences?  Indeed we would have a right to view the ‘evidence’ for our case?  If a crime had been committed then at the very least I would face trial in this country?  Is this not what constitutes justice? 
Allow me to introduce you to several shocking pieces of legislation.

The Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (ATCSA)
The ATCSA was passed by Parliament as a result of the ‘public emergency’ in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.  We had to be seen as doing rather than just talking.  Under Part 4 of the Act, the Secretary of State can certify a non-UK national as a ‘suspected international terrorist’ using secret information that is never revealed to the person concerned.  Detention of non-UK nationals can also be ordered without charge or trial. Consequently, people can and have effectively been charged with a criminal offence, convicted, and sentenced to imprisonment without even having been to trial.

“We do not take responsibility for other countries’ nationals, purely on the basis of residence in the UK.”  UK Foreign Office Minister Valerie Amos

The UK Extradition Act 2003
Apparently we have no regard for non-UK nationals regardless of their length of residence in the UK.  What about the ‘home-grown’ amongst us?  The UK Extradition Act was fast-tracked into legislation in 2003 without formal consultative parliamentary process or debate.  It permits the US to instantly seek the extradition of any British Citizen without providing prima facie evidence to support the extradition request.  Incidentally, the UK is the only country in the EU to sign this treaty with the US. The rest of the EU requested they should also be allowed to extradite a US Citizen if wanted by an EU Country… The US refused.  The US refuses to extradite its own citizens: this would be ‘in breach of their Constitutional Rights’.  Britain has already approved the extradition of several British Citizens to the US without any apparent regard for our ‘constitutional rights’!  Little did we realise that standing ‘shoulder to shoulder’ with our American colleagues would mean that our government would sell out on its own citizens.  Somehow being American today offers greater protection and peace of mind that being British.  Our UK passport now fails to protect us from being plucked from our homes and dragged to the US at the click of the Home Office Minister’s fingers.  A proverbial slap in the face.

Why should British Citizens be inferior to French, German and US counterparts, all of whose governments protect them from such extradition arrangements?

The Terrorism Act 2006
Last year’s Act makes the ‘glorification’ of terrorism a criminal offence.  Unfortunately, under the very broad proposals at defining criminal activity, to support oppressed people’s right to fight against oppression and occupation may be regarded as ‘glorification’. Many people who support the internationally recognised right of self-defence for oppressed people in Palestine and Chechnya may be prosecuted for their beliefs. Under this law, to have supported Nelson Mandela in his struggle against apartheid would also have constituted as glorification of terrorism.

Where and how do we draw the line for freedom of speech?  This Act does not really give us a choice; which ultimately places restrictions on our human rights – lest we be arrested for thinking anything different.

There are limitless stories of detainees held in the Guantanamo Bay of Cuba and Britain.  Families long for the day when they will see their loved ones again: parents wait for sons, wives wait for husbands, children wait for fathers.  As a society, the desire to empathise with one another has been muted.  The use of these prisons to detain terror suspects without legal proceedings has made clear the government’s position on ‘Justice’.  This itself should be a concern to everyone.  Britain is traditionally associated with values of liberty and democracy however, the injustice offered by the immigration courts puts the Union Jack in a different light.  It is time to take a stand and start to reclaim our rights.  We need to increase awareness; decrease ignorance; voice opinions to MPs and make them listen.  We must remove the blindfold that conceals the horrific and disgusting truth.  We owe that much to the countless ‘ghost’ members of our communities. If not for them, for our sake at least.

Many thanks to Cageprisoners, Amnesty International and Liberty. 
Word count: 867

Get Full Article - Issue IGet the Full Article | Return to top